|
SHORTYHAMMER 2:38 Thu Aug 20
Petition re Stratford OS .
|
|
Any one else heard about this..
Seems all the muggy cunts are posting this all over social media..
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/106355
http://www.thstofficial.com/thst-news/press-release-hold-public-inquiry-into-west-ham-lldc-deal-for-rental-of-olympic-stadium
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
1964
1:38 Sat Sep 5
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
This is a better petition to sign
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/106477
|
Arko
1:34 Sat Sep 5
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
Mat Roper is from the Leyton fan branch in this petition group. What the petitioners want ideally (I think) is to have the full details of the deal disclosed, ideally including some unlawful behaviour by certain individuals, bribery, underhand tactics etc. and they want to see those people punished.
As a result they want the terms of the deal renegotiated to the detriment of West Ham (no tribalism of course, this is not about West Ham at all, yeah, right!). They want the sale proceeds of the Boleyn going to the taxpayer, they want a higher rent and they want West Ham having to share their income for corporate seats (where the big money is).
All of this of course without any legal shenanigans which would result in further costs to the taxpayers, the only one who should pay (more) is West Ham.
After all, West Ham will use the OS to flood the neighbourhood with cheap or even free ticket and make sure that no youngster in future will decide to watch Charlton Athletic.
|
KLM
12:44 Sat Sep 5
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
let us suppose their petition is successful, what do they think the consequences for the tax payer will be.
1. WH have a legal contract and, I presume, would be entitled to millions in compensation for loss of income, etc, etc
2. the taxpayer would now have an empty stadium that would need addtl financing by the taxpayer;
3. Unless, of course, TH or Charlton were to move there. presumably, the TH and Charlton signatories to the petition would not be happy with that. Not to mention mr levy who is now committed to keeping TH in Tottinghum.
I am sure mr roper, the Charlton fan has thought about all this. but I think he would be better advised to petition about more serious issues in the world - Trident?- Post Office sell off - than a trivial cock up.
|
Saul Bollox
2:25 Sat Sep 5
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
Eggbert Nobacon 6:31 Fri Sep 4
That statement reminds me of the knight in Monty Python and The Quest for The Holy Grail, still threatening after King Arthur had cut off his legs and arms
|
british is best
2:09 Sat Sep 5
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
The north London' propaganda' queens' and their media made plastic threat are terrified . đ
|
Ronald_antly
1:18 Sat Sep 5
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
On The Ball 12:05 Fri Sep 4
Well it isn't though, is it. If it were simply a case of us renting the venue when we need it, then it would be available for Tottingham to rent for their home games
But that's not how it's going to be.
|
whu
11:37 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
wet knickered cunts
it's done, get back to your fucking allotments
old outdated jealous bollocks
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
6:59 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
The gist of the complaint seems to be, 'It's a conspiracy'.
I'm suprised Ron_Antly isn't all over this.
|
North Bank
6:59 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
64 I suppose that's why they're waiting on legal verification confirming whether or not they are breaking any laws if they went public with it, let's hope they get bad advise, go public with it and get taken to the cleaners
|
1964
6:56 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
North Bank 6:49 Fri Sep 4
Surely if they get any information they're not supposed to they will be subject to another criminal investigation like the private investigators spying for Tottenham.
|
Dapablo
6:52 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
So Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham want to see the terms of our contract, I bet they do, jesus wept.
|
North Bank
6:49 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
1964 I interpreted that as an insider tipping them off about some of the redacted info
|
,
6:46 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
WHU have a legally binding contract with the entity that runs the stadium.
The terms of the agreement cannot be altered.
|
1964
6:43 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
We are currently obtaining professional verification of new information which appears to cast further doubt on the value of the deal for the taxpayer.
As soon as we are confident of the facts and their implications we will make a further announcement. It would surely be in the Governments interest to release the entire contract. If it continues to fall to concerned citizens to uncover the facts, drip by drip, the impression of a cover-up will grow.
---------------------------------------------------------
Are they threatening the government?
|
North Bank
6:42 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
dicksie these nuggets are typical of modern day middle class upstarts, they think they have a right to anything and everything and scream injustice when refused
Why should they have access to sensitive information just because they have a warped sense of injustice, if the contract has been scrutinised and accepted by UK and European Law then that should be the end of it, which hopefully it is
It's all about envy, fuck them
|
alphaharps
6:39 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
they are like a bunch of kids. why dont they grow up. Where do they want petition to next, The Queen?
|
dicksie3
6:37 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
So fucking bored of these wanker supporter groups kicking-up a pathetic stink with 6th form-level, naive, brain-dead ramblings about the apparent injustices of the whole process...
Fucking do one...
|
Eggbert Nobacon
6:31 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham fan coalition brand government response to petition over West Ham stadium deal 'wholly inadequate'
JAMES BENGE Friday 4 September 2015 16:49 BST0 comments
The coalition of supportersâ groups campaigning for a public inquiry into the decision to award West Ham tenancy of the Olympic Stadium have branded the governmentâs response to their petition âwholly inadequateâ.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport yesterday rejected the petition from fans of Arsenal, Tottenham and Chelsea, maintaining that West Hamâs deal for a new stadium âconstituted the best available return for the taxpayerâ.
The governmentâs response reaffirmed its belief that only with the tenancy of a major London football team could the stadium have a viable long-term future.
However the supportersâ groups, which include the initial eight London signatories and fans from six other clubs including Manchester United, Norwich and Everton, immediately condemned the government for their answer to the petition.
âThis statement only recycles arguments we have previously heard from the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) and West Ham United,â said the coalition. âThe facts we have uncovered need to be addressed by the Government. This statement ignores them. It is wholly inadequate.â
âThe Government claims the contract has been widely scrutinised. Yet the taxpayer continues to be denied sight of it. The Government speaks of âprofitsâ flowing to the taxpayer, yet we have shown that no profit comes from West Hamâs rental because matchday overheads normally paid by clubs are in this case paid by the taxpayer.â
And the supporters do not intend to let the issue lie, warning that without the full release of the agreement between West Ham and the LLDC, âthe impression of a cover up will growâ.
The DCMS have refused to release further information on the deal between the two parties, warning that releasing âcommercially sensitiveâ information would damage the negotiating position of stadium operator Vinci.
The coalition claims to have further information which, when released, will support the case of those questioning the value for money the taxpayer has received from the deal.
Their statement added: âWe are currently obtaining professional verification of new information which appears to cast further doubt on the value of the deal for the taxpayer.
âAs soon as we are confident of the facts and their implications we will make a further announcement. It would surely be in the Governmentâs interest to release the entire contract. If it continues to fall to concerned citizens to uncover the facts, drip by drip, the impression of a cover-up will grow.â
The petition, launched last month, received the 10,000 signatures required for a response from the government within 24 hours. It currently has over 24,000 backers, some way short of the 100,000 needed to be considered for debate in Parliament.
The fourteen supportersâ trusts making up the coalition are: Arsenal, Aston Villa, The Blue Union (Everton), Canaries Trust (Norwich City), Charlton Athletic, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, The Dons Trust (AFC Wimbledon), The Foxes Trust (Leicester City), Fulham, Leyton Orient, Manchester United, QPR1st and Tottenham Hotspur.
|
Fifth Column
4:55 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
I just went on that fucking Millwall link someone provided and a virus tried to attack my PC. Just spent 5 minutes sorting it out.
|
Northern Sold
4:37 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
Well why the fuck would I know that P son you big fucking lemsip??
|
Steve P
4:35 Fri Sep 4
Re: Petition re Stratford OS .
|
Stand up for the orient, dunderhead.
|
|
|
|
